SHOULD PHILOSOPHERS AND EDUCATORS BE SPEAKING TO EACH OTHER?

Should psychology be ‘positive’? Letting the philosophers speak

This is a brief commentary on the value of optimism in therapy. It draws on the philosophical writings of Schopenhauer and Aristotle. It suggests that the modern preoccupation with optimism may be as extreme as the bleak pessimistic outlook favoured by Schopenhauer.

Why Philosophers Should Be Designers (commentary on Dennett for Bbs)

This is a short commentary on some aspects of D.C.Dennett’s book The Intentional Stance. The paper criticises the "intentional stance" as not providing real insight into the nature of intelligence because it ignores the question HOW behaviour is produced. The paper argues that only by taking the "design stance" can we understand the difference between intelligent and unintelligent ways of doing...

I-14: Assisted Reproduction and Religion What Consideration Should Be and Should Not Be Relevant,

Several important issues are pertinent to an ethical discussion of the new technology today grouped under the name Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART). This is a moral imperative because each of us must decide what is to be considered ethically acceptable in assisted reproduction. Reflecting on the ethical dimension of ‘creating’ a new human life can play a major role in ensuring that in eac...

Expecting Moral Philosophers to be Reliable ∗

Are philosophers’ intuitions more reliable than philosophical novices’? Are we entitled to assume the superiority of philosophers’ intuitions just as we assume that experts in other domains have more reliable intuitions than novices? Ryberg raises some doubts and his arguments promise to undermine the expertise defence of intuition-use in philosophy once and for all. In this paper, I raise a nu...

researchers in less developed region should be able to communicate and take advantages of other scientists